Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgarden”
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22777
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
- knee tunes
- for those who
are not...shall be - Posts: 8505
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 7:30 am
- Location: nothing
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Vitalogist wrote:As a hotel manager, you can imagine the amount of beige I’ve seen in my career.
- PHATJ
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
- Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
- Location: Gigatown
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Soundgarden is better than this thread.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
There was a time when Other Bands was full of Soundgarden related threads to some chagrin hence [this topic] is better than Soundgarden.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
cool thread bammer
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Not accuratebada wrote:There was a time when Other Bands was full of Soundgarden related threads to some chagrin hence [this topic] is better than Soundgarden.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Thanks for contributing.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Not accuratebada wrote:There was a time when Other Bands was full of Soundgarden related threads to some chagrin hence [this topic] is better than Soundgarden.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
phish is better than soundgarden
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
The more I think about it the more outrageous LVs response becomes.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Someone explain it to him so I can lock this damn thread please.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
What was the first thread with this name? It was something in OB but I don’t remember. Anyway I thought it was funny so I went back and retroactively changed the titles of a bunch of random threads I created. That’s the true story, not bada’s lies
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23452
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Kendrick Lamar?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Haha yeah that sounds right...it’s still funnyAnders wrote:Kendrick Lamar?
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Yes but I believe bada is correct in that the impetus for the original "better than Soundgarden" thread (which I agree was probably Kendrick Lamar) was due to there being a lot of Soundgarden-related content on page 1 of OB at one point
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
I think it was less about volume than it was Alex lobbing a millennial grenade at the middle-aged rockist doofus collective of RMtheplatypus wrote:Yes but I believe bada is correct in that the impetus for the original "better than Soundgarden" thread (which I agree was probably Kendrick Lamar) was due to there being a lot of Soundgarden-related content on page 1 of OB at one point
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
Let's ask Alex
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
LV admit your vicious personal attack against me was not accurate!
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
nobada wrote:LV admit your vicious personal attack against me was not accurate!
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Can someone explain the whole “_ is better than Soundgar
LV is right - everyone was psyched about the soundgarden reunion and king animal and then someone threw a haymaker about kendra lamont being better and it caught on like wildfire
someone should do a ‘behind the RM’ about this
kind of like a ‘behind the music’ but instead about RM
they can interview various RMers to retell the story cut into a running narrative from Chris Connelly that makes it sound like it was a bigger deal than it was
someone should do a ‘behind the RM’ about this
kind of like a ‘behind the music’ but instead about RM
they can interview various RMers to retell the story cut into a running narrative from Chris Connelly that makes it sound like it was a bigger deal than it was
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone