Charity, Philanthropy, and whatnot
Posted: Mon September 23, 2013 2:30 pm
This could use a better opening introductory post, but here goes. Inspired by a half forgotten discussion of philanthropic organizations and their disconnect from their founders. Continued from the guns thread:
Rather getting off track here, but I see that the Joyce foundation (not exactly an impartial observer) is a major contributor to this arm of Harvard's research. Unless I misunderstood the chart http://www.economist.com/news/internati ... nful-sugar, such philanthropic foundations in the US are dwarfed by Italy in monetary value. (something to do with bank/ governmental finance privatization). If all that private US foundations have found to do is fund studies and subsidize NPR, I shudder to think of the value the average taxpayer in Italy has received from them. I'm rather curious as to how these foundations mature from general philanthropic foundations/tax shelters to political organizations with the veneer of charity and tradition. Who just gives the reigns away with hundreds of millions of dollars on the line?Citizen Dick wrote:Human Bass wrote:Frankly, haters gonna hate but this pretty much kills the debate: http://www.examiner.com/article/harvard ... save-livesAre you serious?
It's not a "Harvard study". It's written in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - a conservative Law Review edited by right-wing Harvard Law students that doesn't undergo peer review like a proper scientific study. It's embarrassing as it doesnt even understand basic statistical analysis. Furthermore it is factually wrong and contains incorrect data in several places. This "study" would never have made it through a peer review.
It's not just that they don't understand how to conduct a study they get basic facts wrong. Not just slightly - egregiously. One of the touted statistics is that Luxembourg has a homicide rate of 9.01/100 K. Only it doesn't... it has a rate of 0.9/100K. Yet that incorrect statistic was one that most downstream media picked up and quoted without fact checking. The "study" is an embarrassment.
If you want actual peer-reviewed Harvard studies on gun violence, (I'm sure you won't as they mostly come to the opposite conclusion than this "debate killer")....
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/h ... -research/