Page 1 of 4
Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 11:26 am
by broken iris
http://gawker.com/teen-who-killed-four- ... 1480835092
Teen Who Killed Four People Got Off On Probation Because He's Rich
A 16-year-old boy who drunkenly killed four people got probation this week because
the judge — with no apparent irony — agreed with the boy's defense that he was a victim of "affluenza," whose parents taught him wealth and privilege shield consequences. The teen had faced up to twenty years in prison.
Sixteen-year-old Ethan Couch admitted to four counts of manslaughter after he and seven other boys stole alcohol from Walmart, piled into his car and struck and killed four pedestrians while going 70 miles per hour in a 40 zone. One of his passengers remains in the hospital with severe brain damage, and nine other bystanders were also injured.
Couch's BAC was a .24 and he also had Valium in his system. According to reports, he was belligerent at the scene, at one point saying, "I'm outta here." Prosecutors were hoping to get up to 20 years.
Couch's defense was that he was a victim of his parents' wealth and privilege; in that he never had to face consequences, which an expert summarized prior to sentencing.
He said Couch got whatever he wanted. As an example, Miller said Couch's parents gave no punishment after police ticketed the then-15-year-old when he was found in a parked pickup with a passed out, undressed 14-year-old girl.
Miller also pointed out that Couch was allowed to drive at 13. He said the teen was emotionally flat and needed years of therapy. At the time of the fatal wreck, Couch had a blood alcohol content of .24, said Tarrant County Sheriff Dee Anderson. It is illegal for a minor to drive with any amount of alcohol in his or her system.
The victims' families sort of agree with the reasoning, in that they too feel that Couch's privilege helped him avoid consequences.
This could be the next great project for Anonymous. Permanently fuck this kid.
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 2:02 pm
by McParadigm
Inexplicably, the families of the victims are upset about it.
Weird!
"Reliving the facts and the events was difficult, but probably nothing more difficult than today," said Eric Boyles, who spoke publicly for the first time after losing his wife, Hollie, and daughter, Shelby, on Father's Day weekend.
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 2:14 pm
by knee tunes
See, he should have got vaccinated then none of that would ever have happened
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 3:55 pm
by Electromatic
Just another reason to hate lawyers.
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 6:47 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 8:10 pm
by Heathen
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
*people
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 8:29 pm
by stip
Heathen wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
*people
*rich people
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 8:30 pm
by Electromatic
*experts
But yeah no doubt this happened outside of Dallas.
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 8:31 pm
by Heathen
stip wrote:Heathen wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
*people
*rich people
don't discriminate
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 9:04 pm
by malice
Heathen wrote:stip wrote:Heathen wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
*people
*rich people
don't discriminate
poor and ugly people
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 9:35 pm
by Heathen
malice wrote:Heathen wrote:stip wrote:Heathen wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
*people
*rich people
don't discriminate
poor and ugly people
don't redundate
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 9:44 pm
by Green Habit
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
Don't most (if not all) judges start as lawyers anyway?
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 9:45 pm
by broken iris
Two comments:
1.) I actually agree that the wealth and privilege afford this little piece of shit precluded him from developing the same moral fabric that most of society has
2.) That in no way excuses his actions as he is old enough to know what laws are and what the current law says, even if he doesn't think it applies to him. Mitigating circumstances are things like "my dad beat my mom everyday, so I offed him" not "I'm so spoiled, I shouldn't be punished after I kill people on the side of the road while drunk driving".
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 9:53 pm
by surfndestroy
stip wrote:Heathen wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
*people
*rich people
*people
I don't discriminate
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 9:57 pm
by Whitey McTeeth
He can't go to jail for 20 years, I'm sure his future executive job skills will be needed.
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 10:06 pm
by stip
surfndestroy wrote:stip wrote:Heathen wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Electromatic wrote:Just another reason to hate lawyers.
*judges
*people
*rich people
*people
I don't discriminate
don't hate me. I'm such a nice person when I'm not arguing on the internet
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 10:10 pm
by broken iris
Whitey McTeeth wrote:He can't go to jail for 20 years, I'm sure his future executive job skills will be needed.
Good point, Whitey. He's already met most of the requirements to be a senator from Massachusetts.
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 10:10 pm
by Jorge
team rich kid
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 10:23 pm
by BurtReynolds
Were the pedestrians just poor people though? Maybe their ugliness blinded him.
Re: Affluenza
Posted: Thu December 12, 2013 10:57 pm
by surfndestroy
If this judgement were given to a black kid from a troubled home in a run down part of town, you'd probably be applauding the decision. Saying finally contributing factors were taken into account, he's only 16, he's going to rehab and is on a long parole.
I think the decision sucks. At the very least he should be in juvie jail until 18 and then with the same restictions afterwards. But if this is where you want justice for minors to get to, thismay be a poor first start but a start none the less.