
Hard to Be a God

A Master Builder

La jalousie

Under the Skin
The Grand Budapest Hotel

Nightcrawler

Mr. Turner






Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
definitely.VinylGuy wrote:budapest hotel?? Under the skin??
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
Budapest was simultaneously his most impressive and most lackluster movie, I thought. Yes, the formal structure and frame composition are jaw-droppingly masterful, but I couldn't help but feel a little fatigue and lack of enthusiasm for the Wes Anderson shorthand he's devolved into. If I had never seen a Wes Anderson movie before Budapest, I probably would have loved it, but since I've seen everything he's made, it felt stale, old hat. I didn't feel like he was bringing anything new to the table.Malloy wrote:definitely.VinylGuy wrote:budapest hotel?? Under the skin??
budapest is his most ambitious and narratively interesting film. formally (the frame structure, among other things) it was so impressive. and under the skin, especially the first 3/4s, was totally absorbing. if someone wants to grouse on the ending, i wouldn't blame them.
Malloy wrote:based on loathed's comments, i'd like to see godzilla. and i'm still very interested in watching the lego movie.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
Budapest is a very good film for an art director. The story?..the direction? pretty much all he is doing there is to pan the cam; the actors´direction is lazy to say the least...its like a copy of a wes anderson movie.Malloy wrote:definitely.VinylGuy wrote:budapest hotel?? Under the skin??
budapest is his most ambitious and narratively interesting film. formally (the frame structure, among other things) it was so impressive. and under the skin, especially the first 3/4s, was totally absorbing. if someone wants to grouse on the ending, i wouldn't blame them.
@SkitchP wrote:I appreciate you acknowledging my post in a thread I so clearly have no place in.Malloy wrote:based on loathed's comments, i'd like to see godzilla. and i'm still very interested in watching the lego movie.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
i'd say it was impressive for any director, regardless of the qualifier. (and, in fact, i'm usually incredulous of those directors who feel it necessary to add one). a friend and i have talked through the movie a few times.VinylGuy wrote:Budapest is a very good film for an art director. The story?..the direction? pretty much all he is doing there is to pan the cam; the actors´direction is lazy to say the least...its like a copy of a wes anderson movie.Malloy wrote:definitely.VinylGuy wrote:budapest hotel?? Under the skin??
budapest is his most ambitious and narratively interesting film. formally (the frame structure, among other things) it was so impressive. and under the skin, especially the first 3/4s, was totally absorbing. if someone wants to grouse on the ending, i wouldn't blame them.
Pretty much like Quentin´s Django Unchained.
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
i appreciate you, skitchp@SkitchP wrote:Malloy wrote:based on loathed's comments, i'd like to see godzilla. and i'm still very interested in watching the lego movie.
I appreciate you acknowledging my post in a thread I so clearly have no place in.
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
the movie only really came together for me in the last 1/4.Malloy wrote:definitely.VinylGuy wrote:budapest hotel?? Under the skin??
budapest is his most ambitious and narratively interesting film. formally (the frame structure, among other things) it was so impressive. and under the skin, especially the first 3/4s, was totally absorbing. if someone wants to grouse on the ending, i wouldn't blame them.
Child of God is good, but not a masterpiece by any means.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm looking forward to Child of God.
agreeLoathedVermin72 wrote: If I had never seen a Wes Anderson movie before Budapest, I probably would have loved it, but since I've seen everything he's made, it felt stale, old hat. I didn't feel like he was bringing anything new to the table.
Can't I still look forward to it, dev?Dev wrote:Child of God is good, but not a masterpiece by any means.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm looking forward to Child of God.