Page 1 of 2

Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Wed October 22, 2014 5:08 pm
by Simple Torture
Not sure if there are any RMers based in Ottawa, but stay safe, ya'll.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/22/world/ame ... ?hpt=hp_t1

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Wed October 22, 2014 5:18 pm
by philpritchard
This is really scary stuff.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Wed October 22, 2014 5:29 pm
by mf
I have a lot of family and friends there, scary stuff indeed.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Wed October 22, 2014 5:49 pm
by Biff Pocoroba
Three separate shootings?

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Wed October 22, 2014 6:01 pm
by Simple Torture
Biff Pocoroba wrote:Three separate shootings?
That's what initial reports said, but based on previous experience, I wouldn't be surprised if that number comes down.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Wed October 22, 2014 6:04 pm
by mf
Biff Pocoroba wrote:Three separate shootings?
3 locations that are all very close together - whether they are from 3 separate incidents is still unclear. From what I understand it started with a passenger getting out of a car and opening fire on a soldier at a war memorial, who then ran a short distance to the Parliament building where the original car/driver had stopped. It seems as though a suspect was gunned down by police inside Parliament. So one or more gunmen in the building? There were then later reports of gunfire at a nearby shopping centre, which is about a block from the original site where the soldier was shot.

here's raw video of the gunfire from within Parliament.


Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Wed October 22, 2014 6:13 pm
by philpritchard
It sounds like there was no shooting at the Rideau Centre now, and the soldier who was shot has apparently died. Horrible, horrible news.

It looks likened an RCMP press conference will be happening soon.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 8:15 am
by Dev
This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 2:05 pm
by philpritchard
Dev wrote:This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.
So... this happened because the guy didn't like Harper?

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 2:40 pm
by Alex
dev finally snapped

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 11:29 pm
by Dev
philpritchard wrote:
Dev wrote:This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.
So... this happened because the guy didn't like Harper?
I think Harper has changed the world's opinion of Canada to an extent.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 11:34 pm
by Rangi Guy
Dev wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Dev wrote:This is the kind of hatred Harper brings. He just pisses the world off. Russia imposed trade sanctions on us, because of his big mouth.
So... this happened because the guy didn't like Harper?
I think Harper has changed the world's opinion of Canada to an extent.
Nope - everyone seems still like Canada buddy!

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 2:04 am
by simple schoolboy
We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 1:02 pm
by mastaflatch
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 9:17 pm
by Dev
mastaflatch wrote:
Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
thank-you

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Sat October 25, 2014 5:13 pm
by Stickman
One of Cpl. Cirillo's dogs waits for him to come home.
Image

Some pictures of Cpl. Nathan Cirillo's final ride on the Highway of Heroes.


Image

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Sun October 26, 2014 8:55 am
by simple schoolboy
mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Sun October 26, 2014 12:37 pm
by doone
simple schoolboy wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.
I'm not sure what is being argued here but Quebec doesn't have it's own Prime Minister, it has a Premier, like all the other provinces. I have not heard if they've discovered a motive for the Ottawa guy other than psychological.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Mon October 27, 2014 12:53 am
by mastaflatch
doone wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.
I'm not sure what is being argued here but Quebec doesn't have it's own Prime Minister, it has a Premier, like all the other provinces. I have not heard if they've discovered a motive for the Ottawa guy other than psychological.
In french, they're called prime ministers. as in provincial prime ministers.

I think that the three of them are religion motivated nutjobs but then, I think that most killers are somewhat nuts. The troubling details in these are the targets, hence the political recuperation that happens (or didn't in the case of Marois). You shouldn't be considered nuts if Jesus told you to do it but a terrorist if Allah did.

Re: Shots fired, eh?

Posted: Mon October 27, 2014 1:06 am
by doone
mastaflatch wrote:
doone wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:We're both the shooter and the driver in the other incident Qubecers? Maybe it's not Harper so much but that darned Anglo cultural hegemony.
Apparently the Ottawa guy once lived in Montreal - the driver was def a quebecer but both had become ISIS afficionados so I'm quite sure it had nothing to do with the french/anglo thing.

It must be remembered that a bit more than a year ago, some dude tried to shoot the then-newly-elected Quebec prime minister (the Parti Quebecois leader Pauline Marois, who was, incidentally, the first woman to hold this position here) but ended up killing a sound tech instead. His agenda was pretty clear - he was against francophones. Of course, that was not handled as a terrorism act. Federalist news outlets prefered to called the shooter "a troubled lover of the great Canada".

Harper did change Canada's role in world affairs, turning the traditionnally humanitarian role of the army into a completely biaised and belligerent organization. I don't mean to justify this week attacks but to see this as a surprise is pretty fucking naive.
Pointing to an insane shooter to support policy changes is a failing strategy. The attempted shooter of the Quebec Prime Minister claimed that Jesus told him to do so. I'd love a follow up article, fuck, I'd love to be wrong, but I'd wager he's just nuts. And damn it, scrolling through more than three Google pages makes it obscure in my book.
I'm not sure what is being argued here but Quebec doesn't have it's own Prime Minister, it has a Premier, like all the other provinces. I have not heard if they've discovered a motive for the Ottawa guy other than psychological.
In french, they're called prime ministers. as in provincial prime ministers.
.
Really? huh. So what do they call the actual Prime Minister?