D4 Round 2ah: Marker in the Sand vs. Speed of Sound (demo)
Posted: Fri February 20, 2015 1:34 pm
D4 Round 2ah: Marker in the Sand vs. Speed of Sound (demo)
durdencommatyler wrote:God I love Marker.
Me too, dct -- I have never identified with the common "verses strong, choruses weak" position on this song -- to me that chorus is a beautiful release of tension, which hits its emotional stride when Matt kicks up the tempo at the end (the "calling out" part). I think it's one of the unequivocal high points of the post-"Riot Act" years, and slays "Speed of Sound"' -- even the lovely demo version.durdencommatyler wrote:God I love Marker.
Well said. 100% agree. And it's one of maybe 3 songs on S/T that continues to get better with age. I liked the song from first listen, but now it's easily my favorite song on the album. Parachutes being an on-the-heels close second.Kevin Davis wrote:Me too, dct -- I have never identified with the common "verses strong, choruses weak" position on this song -- to me that chorus is a beautiful release of tension, which hits its emotional stride when Matt kicks up the tempo at the end (the "calling out" part). I think it's one of the unequivocal high points of the post-"Riot Act" years, and slays "Speed of Sound"' -- even the lovely demo version.durdencommatyler wrote:God I love Marker.
Funny, I was just about to post that Marker has really aged well for me. I liked it initially, but it was still pretty far behind Parachutes and Army Reserve. Now, Marker and Parachutes are neck-and-neck above Army Reserve.durdencommatyler wrote:Well said. 100% agree. And it's one of maybe 3 songs on S/T that continues to get better with age. I liked the song from first listen, but now it's easily my favorite song on the album. Parachutes being an on-the-heels close second.Kevin Davis wrote:Me too, dct -- I have never identified with the common "verses strong, choruses weak" position on this song -- to me that chorus is a beautiful release of tension, which hits its emotional stride when Matt kicks up the tempo at the end (the "calling out" part). I think it's one of the unequivocal high points of the post-"Riot Act" years, and slays "Speed of Sound"' -- even the lovely demo version.durdencommatyler wrote:God I love Marker.
Strat wrote:Why is this round all latter day pj match ups? Is this thing rigged by stip cause he knows none of these songs would last a second otherwise?
I share the complaint that the transitions are sometimes a little troubling, but the verses are very good and the chorus is wonderful.durdencommatyler wrote:Maybe I just haven't been paying too much attention to criticisms of the song. But I had no idea "strong verse, weak chorus" was a typical complaint. Huh. Yeah, I don't agree with that at all. The chorus is my favorite part of the song. And I think it has one of the stronger chorus from S/T or Backspacer.
I like the new format. It makes these earlier rounds far more interesting, IMO. I voted for Marker, but I do really like Speed of Sound (both the demo and the studio versions).stip wrote:Strat wrote:Why is this round all latter day pj match ups? Is this thing rigged by stip cause he knows none of these songs would last a second otherwise?
The songs were broken down into 4 chronological divisions (91-93, 94-96, 98-2002, 2003-present). The top 4 or 8 songs from each group (whatever the rules post says) will then compete against each other to determine the winner. I thought this would shake up the final rounds a bit, and that the smaller period tournaments would be interesting.
Also what you said.
PHATJ wrote:I voted for Marker, but I do really like Speed of Sound (both the demo and the studio versions).
MITS is 4.5* PJ. It's great. Matts great. Even fucking Boom is great.durdencommatyler wrote:God I love Marker.
Yes yes yes. The 3 real highlight of the album right there. Play those three with CC and LiR and a whole new album comes to light. A ST reissue is the most anticipated release these guys can do for me. Even over new material.EJ wrote:Funny, I was just about to post that Marker has really aged well for me. I liked it initially, but it was still pretty far behind Parachutes and Army Reserve. Now, Marker and Parachutes are neck-and-neck above Army Reserve.durdencommatyler wrote:Well said. 100% agree. And it's one of maybe 3 songs on S/T that continues to get better with age. I liked the song from first listen, but now it's easily my favorite song on the album. Parachutes being an on-the-heels close second.Kevin Davis wrote:Me too, dct -- I have never identified with the common "verses strong, choruses weak" position on this song -- to me that chorus is a beautiful release of tension, which hits its emotional stride when Matt kicks up the tempo at the end (the "calling out" part). I think it's one of the unequivocal high points of the post-"Riot Act" years, and slays "Speed of Sound"' -- even the lovely demo version.durdencommatyler wrote:God I love Marker.
Dividing the tournament up this way has forced me to listen to post-Riot Act Pearl Jam.stip wrote:Strat wrote:Why is this round all latter day pj match ups? Is this thing rigged by stip cause he knows none of these songs would last a second otherwise?
The songs were broken down into 4 chronological divisions (91-93, 94-96, 98-2002, 2003-present). The top 4 or 8 songs from each group (whatever the rules post says) will then compete against each other to determine the winner. I thought this would shake up the final rounds a bit, and that the smaller period tournaments would be interesting.
Also what you said.
