FKA twigs
Posted: Sat August 29, 2015 5:55 am
This woman is crazy talented and her new EP (M3LL155X) is fucking killer.
First, there are plenty of memorable melodies and hooks in her songs. If you can't hear those, then I don't know what to say other than I would question how much of her stuff you have actually heard. My comment previously was about how she can skew traditional choruses. To me, she uses her music a lot like Bjork does sometimes in that she uses tonal shifts to create the hooks instead of just repeating a phrase over and over again.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Fair enough, though I'm not as convinced of solidity of the songwriting, or that it's just "subtle." Mostly it just sounds kind of noisy, like she's trying really hard to be atmospheric and moody. It comes across like a lot of attempt and not a lot of follow-through. That probably would have been okay with me when I was younger, but now I get bored by moody atmospherics if they're not attached to memorable melodies/songs/hooks; so many other artists can capture this tone/sound without sacrificing that. But I get why someone would disagree; I know our tastes are very different, t2b.
Oh, I'm only talking about the new EP. I haven't heard anything else.turned2black wrote:First, there are plenty of memorable melodies and hooks in her songs. If you can't hear those, then I don't know what to say other than I would question how much of her stuff you have actually heard.
It reminds me of stuff I used to write when I was younger, when I was so concerned with capturing a certain mood or idea that I didn't bother to establish an actual song beneath the noise. So when I listen to this, I feel like I'm just hearing that attempt, that fixation on capturing a certain something, but not a well-constructed song to carry that. Again, it might just be an issue of personal taste, because that's not necessarily good or bad, but like I said, these days I definitely want that song to go with it. But I know we also disagree about the "hookiness" (or lack thereof). For the record, I have never heard any Bjork that sounded as unmemorable and formless as this - she always has a strong sense of melody and composition.I don't know what to say about "It comes across like a lot of attempt and not a lot of follow-through." Can you be more specific? It sounds like you just don't dig it, which is fine.
Yeah, we just have different tastes.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, I'm only talking about the new EP. I haven't heard anything else.turned2black wrote:First, there are plenty of memorable melodies and hooks in her songs. If you can't hear those, then I don't know what to say other than I would question how much of her stuff you have actually heard.
It reminds me of stuff I used to write when I was younger, when I was so concerned with capturing a certain mood or idea that I didn't bother to establish an actual song beneath the noise. So when I listen to this, I feel like I'm just hearing that attempt, that fixation on capturing a certain something, but not a well-constructed song to carry that. Again, it might just be an issue of personal taste, because that's not necessarily good or bad, but like I said, these days I definitely want that song to go with it. But I know we also disagree about the "hookiness" (or lack thereof). For the record, I have never heard any Bjork that sounded as unmemorable and formless as this - she always has a strong sense of melody and composition.I don't know what to say about "It comes across like a lot of attempt and not a lot of follow-through." Can you be more specific? It sounds like you just don't dig it, which is fine.
Upon further reflection, I think a lot of this would be somewhat palliated if I thought her lyrics/themes were interesting or insightful, but I definitely don't think they are. That video is pretty awful, too.
Let me hear thisI used to write when I was younger, when I was so concerned with capturing a certain mood or idea that I didn't bother to establish an actual song beneath the noise. So when I listen to this