Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35446
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
10 Cloverfield Lane
so this is happening
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45831
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane
The trailer is a little cryptic, but if it IS indicative of the movie, this seems like a pretty creative way to approach a sequel.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane
I don't even remember Cloverfield, but I'm in.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane
They had me at John Goodman.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
I know, I know. But someone had to start the thread. And as I'm one of 4 people on the planet that liked Cloverfield, I'll happily state that I'm pretty excited about this.
Looks like a great sequel premise and I LOVE the cast. I'm looking forward to it.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
"We wanted to make it a blood relative of ‘Cloverfield’. The idea was developed over time. We wanted to hold back the title for as long as possible." - JJ Abrams
- Brett
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
I really liked Cloverfield, as well, and the trailer for this is really compelling. I'm skeptical of the sequel thing, since "blood relative" is ambiguous, and could mean anything. I don't care either way, though, since what's been shown so far already makes me want to check this out.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
Exactly this.Brett wrote:I really liked Cloverfield, as well, and the trailer for this is really compelling. I'm skeptical of the sequel thing, since "blood relative" is ambiguous, and could mean anything. I don't care either way, though, since what's been shown so far already makes me want to check this out.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
Cloverfield was a neat idea that was completely wasted by bad storytelling, some of the only truly bad acting ever seen in a JJ Abrams production, and a lot of real Transformers-level silliness (see: mini-monsters).
But this was a cool trailer, and with a different director and different writers, who knows?
But this was a cool trailer, and with a different director and different writers, who knows?
(patriotic choking noises)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
Yeah, totally different writing team and director.McParadigm wrote:Cloverfield was a neat idea that was completely wasted by bad storytelling, some of the only truly bad acting ever seen in a JJ Abrams production, and a lot of real Transformers-level silliness (see: mini-monsters).
But this was a cool trailer, and with a different director and different writers, who knows?
- patrick
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 8:23 pm
- Location: Our Texas
- Contact:
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
There was already a thread!durdencommatyler wrote: I know, I know. But someone had to start the thread.
Merge!
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
That's amazing.patrick wrote:There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
(patriotic choking noises)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.McParadigm wrote:That's amazing.patrick wrote:There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
I think it gives it a better chance of not sucking. It was built to stand on its own...nobody wrote it to recreate anything or to repackage Cloverfield's jokes. It won't be a mimic and it won't assume that it can gain fans because of its name.E.H. Ruddock wrote:If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.McParadigm wrote:That's amazing.patrick wrote:There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
It's a shit thing to do to the people who made it, but it'd be funny if it turns out to be a better movie than Cloverfield.
(patriotic choking noises)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
I'm not going to not-see it because it isn't linked to Cloverfield. I didn't like it that much anyway, I hate shaky cam shit. I just think the premise sounds kind of weak, even for a post-apocalyptic movie. (probably my favorite genre). After reading that, though, it didn't really explain how it ties in to Cloverfield. Or did I miss something?McParadigm wrote:I think it gives it a better chance of not sucking. It was built to stand on its own...nobody wrote it to recreate anything or to repackage Cloverfield's jokes. It won't be a mimic and it won't assume that it can gain fans because of its name.E.H. Ruddock wrote:If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.McParadigm wrote:That's amazing.patrick wrote:There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
It's a shit thing to do to the people who made it, but it'd be funny if it turns out to be a better movie than Cloverfield.
- Spoiler: show
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- patrick
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 8:23 pm
- Location: Our Texas
- Contact:
Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane
No, the thread doesn't explain how it ties in Cloverfield. I could have sworn there was another trailer (maybe during the super bowl?) that shows her outside of the bunker and looks up at a bright light.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm not going to not-see it because it isn't linked to Cloverfield. I didn't like it that much anyway, I hate shaky cam shit. I just think the premise sounds kind of weak, even for a post-apocalyptic movie. (probably my favorite genre). After reading that, though, it didn't really explain how it ties in to Cloverfield. Or did I miss something?McParadigm wrote:I think it gives it a better chance of not sucking. It was built to stand on its own...nobody wrote it to recreate anything or to repackage Cloverfield's jokes. It won't be a mimic and it won't assume that it can gain fans because of its name.E.H. Ruddock wrote:If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.McParadigm wrote:That's amazing.patrick wrote:There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
It's a shit thing to do to the people who made it, but it'd be funny if it turns out to be a better movie than Cloverfield.
- Spoiler: show
Still, it looks dvd/Netflix worthy to me.