Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by spike »

so this is happening

User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by VinylGuy »

Loved it.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45831
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by BurtReynolds »

Shaky Cam 2: The Shakening
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

The trailer is a little cryptic, but if it IS indicative of the movie, this seems like a pretty creative way to approach a sequel.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by B »

I don't even remember Cloverfield, but I'm in.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

They had me at John Goodman.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by epilogue »



I know, I know. But someone had to start the thread. And as I'm one of 4 people on the planet that liked Cloverfield, I'll happily state that I'm pretty excited about this.

Looks like a great sequel premise and I LOVE the cast. I'm looking forward to it.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Wait this is a sequel?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by epilogue »

"We wanted to make it a blood relative of ‘Cloverfield’. The idea was developed over time. We wanted to hold back the title for as long as possible." - JJ Abrams
User avatar
Brett
AnalLog
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by Brett »

I really liked Cloverfield, as well, and the trailer for this is really compelling. I'm skeptical of the sequel thing, since "blood relative" is ambiguous, and could mean anything. I don't care either way, though, since what's been shown so far already makes me want to check this out.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by epilogue »

Brett wrote:I really liked Cloverfield, as well, and the trailer for this is really compelling. I'm skeptical of the sequel thing, since "blood relative" is ambiguous, and could mean anything. I don't care either way, though, since what's been shown so far already makes me want to check this out.
Exactly this.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by McParadigm »

Cloverfield was a neat idea that was completely wasted by bad storytelling, some of the only truly bad acting ever seen in a JJ Abrams production, and a lot of real Transformers-level silliness (see: mini-monsters).

But this was a cool trailer, and with a different director and different writers, who knows?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by epilogue »

McParadigm wrote:Cloverfield was a neat idea that was completely wasted by bad storytelling, some of the only truly bad acting ever seen in a JJ Abrams production, and a lot of real Transformers-level silliness (see: mini-monsters).

But this was a cool trailer, and with a different director and different writers, who knows?
Yeah, totally different writing team and director.
User avatar
patrick
A Return To Form
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 8:23 pm
Location: Our Texas
Contact:

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by patrick »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.

Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

durdencommatyler wrote: I know, I know. But someone had to start the thread.
There was already a thread! :haha:
Merge!
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by McParadigm »

patrick wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.

Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
That's amazing.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

McParadigm wrote:
patrick wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.

Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
That's amazing.
If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by McParadigm »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
patrick wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.

Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
That's amazing.
If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.
I think it gives it a better chance of not sucking. It was built to stand on its own...nobody wrote it to recreate anything or to repackage Cloverfield's jokes. It won't be a mimic and it won't assume that it can gain fans because of its name.

It's a shit thing to do to the people who made it, but it'd be funny if it turns out to be a better movie than Cloverfield.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

McParadigm wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
patrick wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.

Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
That's amazing.
If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.
I think it gives it a better chance of not sucking. It was built to stand on its own...nobody wrote it to recreate anything or to repackage Cloverfield's jokes. It won't be a mimic and it won't assume that it can gain fans because of its name.

It's a shit thing to do to the people who made it, but it'd be funny if it turns out to be a better movie than Cloverfield.
I'm not going to not-see it because it isn't linked to Cloverfield. I didn't like it that much anyway, I hate shaky cam shit. I just think the premise sounds kind of weak, even for a post-apocalyptic movie. (probably my favorite genre). After reading that, though, it didn't really explain how it ties in to Cloverfield. Or did I miss something?
Spoiler: show
It said the world ended because the Iranians nuked everybody, not because of the monster, right?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
patrick
A Return To Form
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 8:23 pm
Location: Our Texas
Contact:

Re: Film: 10 Cloverfield Lane

Post by patrick »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
patrick wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait this is a sequel?
There was a big Reddit thread about whether it was a sequel or a different movie with a shoehorned tie in to the original.

Spoilers, I guess: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comment ... post_from/
That's amazing.
If that is true, I will never watch this movie. What a shame/sham.
I think it gives it a better chance of not sucking. It was built to stand on its own...nobody wrote it to recreate anything or to repackage Cloverfield's jokes. It won't be a mimic and it won't assume that it can gain fans because of its name.

It's a shit thing to do to the people who made it, but it'd be funny if it turns out to be a better movie than Cloverfield.
I'm not going to not-see it because it isn't linked to Cloverfield. I didn't like it that much anyway, I hate shaky cam shit. I just think the premise sounds kind of weak, even for a post-apocalyptic movie. (probably my favorite genre). After reading that, though, it didn't really explain how it ties in to Cloverfield. Or did I miss something?
Spoiler: show
It said the world ended because the Iranians nuked everybody, not because of the monster, right?
No, the thread doesn't explain how it ties in Cloverfield. I could have sworn there was another trailer (maybe during the super bowl?) that shows her outside of the bunker and looks up at a bright light.

Still, it looks dvd/Netflix worthy to me.
Post Reply