Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by evenslow »

Mentioned this in the Soundgarden thread and thought I'd start it up over here proper.

I'm always fascinated by production talk and recording technique and mixing choices and such. The problem is I'm not nearly steeped enough in studio "speak" to sound coherent. But I love when people break that shit down.

So here is a thread for it. :ohyeah!:

I suppose I'll start off by talking about what made me think about this in the first place. The March Madness tournament had me hone in on a few songs on No Code in particular, and the dynamics on that record are insane.

On the one hand you have the airy yet intimate feel of songs like Sometimes, Present Tense and Around the Bend.

On the other hand you have the wall of barking guitars sound of Hail Hail, Habit and Lukin. Hail Hail in particular is so expertly mixed because you can hear each individual instrument but together they sound monstrous.

Then you have Jack's drums which, to my ears anyway, sound like they're mic'd very differently from how they are on Yield. On No Code, they sound much more distant to me.

What was BOB's technique here?

Would love to hear some of you technical geniuses pipe in on this and other albums.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by evenslow »

Trag, you are the king. Fucking shit man, thanks for the thoughtful answer.

I would kill to know how much input the band has into technical stuff like this. I assume most of it is like Trag playing the BOB part for evenslow, and translating feelings into technical know-how.

But Stone has a studio and I'm sure he knows a lot of the ins and outs - would love to hear the conversations they have about this. I'm assuming since they got BOB back in the fold, they've basically delegated everything to him, i.e., we perform, you record.

As for Jack's drums, it seems like his drums are more up front in the mix on Brain of J, especially compared to something like Habit. But like you say, it probably has less to do with his drums than with how the guitars are mixed.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

in my expert opinion no code sound real good
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by evenslow »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:in my expert opinion no code sound real good
/thread
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by zeb »

tragabigzanda wrote:Re: Your first comment about the dynamics of No Code -- I've never looked at a wav form, but I'd say there's a very broad dynamic range on that record. Both Sometimes and Off He Goes are very quiet songs followed by blasts of jarring rock. You'd have a tough time talking with a few friends over Sometimes and Off He Goes and still hear the music; those songs demand your attention if you actually wish to hear anything. But of course you could have a conversation over Hail, Hail and Habit, without having to reach for your volume dial. This is a good indication of a record with broad dynamic range: the quiet songs require you to listen, or turn up the volume if there's too much ambient noise in your listening environment; while the loud songs hit you with a force precisely because they stand in contrast to the quieter parts of the album. It's something that's obviously been lost with the last couple releases, and when combined with Matt's playing style and the pushing of Ed's vox to the front of the mix, any sense of subtlety has been completely lost. A song like Come Back or Yellow Moon should be quieter, should demand that you pay attention, but of course they don't; they come out your speakers at roughly the same volume as the loud songs.

Re: your comment about Jack's drums -- It's difficult to gauge, because No Code really plays like a hodgepodge of different recording techniques and environments. But listen to Hail, Hail and Brain of J, two loud rockers with a similar pallet, and his drums sound very similar to me. There's a slight difference in the sound of his kick and snare, but not much -- Both are fairly dry and up-front. I'd say the actual instruments have maybe changed, and I think there's a bit more room sound to the snare in Brain of J (and possibly it's a different room, at that).

The main difference I hear between those two songs is the volume of the guitars. They are really massive in Hail, Hail, and I wonder if that's what makes the drums sound further away to you? Whereas in Brain of J, I think they are dialed down a small amount to let the drums, and the sense of space around the drums, take a bit more precedent.

Another thing I really love on those two records is this sort of mid-range fuzziness. There are all sorts of non-scientific terms for the characteristics a particular piece of audio gear may lend to a track, and then there's a lot of science and peeking-under-the-hood that gets done in an attempt to explain those characteristics.

Based on articles I've read about Southern Tracks (where No Code and Yield were mixed), we can assume both albums were mixed on an SSL console. This has a reputation as being very "surgical," meaning that the EQ is so smooth that the engineer can dial all the tracks in to just the right part of the EQ realm. Yet that's not what I'm hearing -- as I said, I hear this mid-range fuzziness. That sort of sound is sometimes called a "Neve haze," or similar, because it's commonly heard on Neve equipment; other pieces that impart a similar characteristic are Pultecs and Fairchilds. In a nutshell, as a particular realm of EQ starts to get crowded by multiple tracks, you begin to hear a slight buildup of harmonic distortion that many listeners find very pleasing. You can't really get that sound on an SSL, because the EQ circuitry is too clean.

So assuming both albums were mixed on the surgical SSL, I'd wager a lot of the tracks were recorded with Neve mic pres, and/or there is some Neve, Fairchild, or Pultec gear used while mixing in addition to the SSL EQs. A blog post briefly mentions BOB using a Pultec somewhere on Yield: http://www.swimmingpoolqs.com/jeff-cald ... m-facilit/
Neve equipment is expensive, but not nearly as expensive as Pultec or Fairchild stuff, which can often fetch $30K-$60K for ONE SINGLE CHANNEL of equipment, so you typically see those two used on one track everywhere on an album. They impart such a desirable quality that mix engineers will often find something that is really flattered by the equipment, then make that sound a lynchpin of an album's overall vibe. I wish I could pick out where those units are used on those records (if I had to guess, I'd say the vox and bass). One really great intro to the Fairchild sound is Thurston Moore's vox on the Rather Ripped album. Once I heard that sound, and knew that's what he used, I could never un-hear it.

It's a huge contrast to the last few records which, apart from the lack of dynamic range, sound like they were tracked and mixed on very "fast" gear, like an API or similar. This equipment has very short, clean circuitry, and you never hear any harmonic distortion. It's a characteristic that is sorely lacking on Backspace and Lightning Bolt (while S/T is too squashed, I do think it has some nice harmonic distortion). Compared to No Code and Yield, those records sound downright clinical in their execution -- the playing, recording, mixing, and mastering leaves nothing to the imagination, no little corners to revisit on headphones to hear something new over time.

I'll stop here and let one of the other audio guys chime in.
Solid post, mate.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

zeb wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Re: Your first comment about the dynamics of No Code -- I've never looked at a wav form, but I'd say there's a very broad dynamic range on that record. Both Sometimes and Off He Goes are very quiet songs followed by blasts of jarring rock. You'd have a tough time talking with a few friends over Sometimes and Off He Goes and still hear the music; those songs demand your attention if you actually wish to hear anything. But of course you could have a conversation over Hail, Hail and Habit, without having to reach for your volume dial. This is a good indication of a record with broad dynamic range: the quiet songs require you to listen, or turn up the volume if there's too much ambient noise in your listening environment; while the loud songs hit you with a force precisely because they stand in contrast to the quieter parts of the album. It's something that's obviously been lost with the last couple releases, and when combined with Matt's playing style and the pushing of Ed's vox to the front of the mix, any sense of subtlety has been completely lost. A song like Come Back or Yellow Moon should be quieter, should demand that you pay attention, but of course they don't; they come out your speakers at roughly the same volume as the loud songs.

Re: your comment about Jack's drums -- It's difficult to gauge, because No Code really plays like a hodgepodge of different recording techniques and environments. But listen to Hail, Hail and Brain of J, two loud rockers with a similar pallet, and his drums sound very similar to me. There's a slight difference in the sound of his kick and snare, but not much -- Both are fairly dry and up-front. I'd say the actual instruments have maybe changed, and I think there's a bit more room sound to the snare in Brain of J (and possibly it's a different room, at that).

The main difference I hear between those two songs is the volume of the guitars. They are really massive in Hail, Hail, and I wonder if that's what makes the drums sound further away to you? Whereas in Brain of J, I think they are dialed down a small amount to let the drums, and the sense of space around the drums, take a bit more precedent.

Another thing I really love on those two records is this sort of mid-range fuzziness. There are all sorts of non-scientific terms for the characteristics a particular piece of audio gear may lend to a track, and then there's a lot of science and peeking-under-the-hood that gets done in an attempt to explain those characteristics.

Based on articles I've read about Southern Tracks (where No Code and Yield were mixed), we can assume both albums were mixed on an SSL console. This has a reputation as being very "surgical," meaning that the EQ is so smooth that the engineer can dial all the tracks in to just the right part of the EQ realm. Yet that's not what I'm hearing -- as I said, I hear this mid-range fuzziness. That sort of sound is sometimes called a "Neve haze," or similar, because it's commonly heard on Neve equipment; other pieces that impart a similar characteristic are Pultecs and Fairchilds. In a nutshell, as a particular realm of EQ starts to get crowded by multiple tracks, you begin to hear a slight buildup of harmonic distortion that many listeners find very pleasing. You can't really get that sound on an SSL, because the EQ circuitry is too clean.

So assuming both albums were mixed on the surgical SSL, I'd wager a lot of the tracks were recorded with Neve mic pres, and/or there is some Neve, Fairchild, or Pultec gear used while mixing in addition to the SSL EQs. A blog post briefly mentions BOB using a Pultec somewhere on Yield: http://www.swimmingpoolqs.com/jeff-cald ... m-facilit/
Neve equipment is expensive, but not nearly as expensive as Pultec or Fairchild stuff, which can often fetch $30K-$60K for ONE SINGLE CHANNEL of equipment, so you typically see those two used on one track everywhere on an album. They impart such a desirable quality that mix engineers will often find something that is really flattered by the equipment, then make that sound a lynchpin of an album's overall vibe. I wish I could pick out where those units are used on those records (if I had to guess, I'd say the vox and bass). One really great intro to the Fairchild sound is Thurston Moore's vox on the Rather Ripped album. Once I heard that sound, and knew that's what he used, I could never un-hear it.

It's a huge contrast to the last few records which, apart from the lack of dynamic range, sound like they were tracked and mixed on very "fast" gear, like an API or similar. This equipment has very short, clean circuitry, and you never hear any harmonic distortion. It's a characteristic that is sorely lacking on Backspace and Lightning Bolt (while S/T is too squashed, I do think it has some nice harmonic distortion). Compared to No Code and Yield, those records sound downright clinical in their execution -- the playing, recording, mixing, and mastering leaves nothing to the imagination, no little corners to revisit on headphones to hear something new over time.

I'll stop here and let one of the other audio guys chime in.
Solid post, mate.
Yep, 5/7
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by stip »

i love these kinds of technical posts since my music vocabulary is so underdeveloped
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by stip »

trag, which album has your favorite production?
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by evenslow »

stip wrote:trag, which album has your favorite production?
And a follow-up Mr. Trag (and anyone else with musical vocabulary), which album deploys Ed's vox in the best way?
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Juvenal
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:31 am

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by Juvenal »

Those are superb, insightful posts, Trag. Very illuminating, thank you.
stip wrote:I wanted to punch you in your god's dice loving balls for not loving lightning bolt.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by evenslow »

Really need to change the title of this thread to Ask Trag Anything. This is awesome.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by evenslow »

tragabigzanda wrote:and I think it's been condenser mics from Riot Act onward. Which is a shame, because he's gotten so breathy and wharbly, and they're pushing his vox ahead of the rest of the mix, so the whole thing is super unflattering.
So why on earth would BOB go in that direction? He must think there's some kind of benefit. Or has he completely lost the plot?
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

evenslow wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:and I think it's been condenser mics from Riot Act onward. Which is a shame, because he's gotten so breathy and wharbly, and they're pushing his vox ahead of the rest of the mix, so the whole thing is super unflattering.
So why on earth would BOB go in that direction? He must think there's some kind of benefit. Or has he completely lost the plot?
Well, doesn't the wider audience love this kind of sound, though? Haven't the last three albums been PJ's most successful in a long time? It sounds like shit, but it's sellable shit.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by Jorge »

Trag, can you give us your opinion as to the origin of the phantom drum sound at the start of "Swallowed Whole"?



Is it Ed's mic picking up a drum track they later deleted, or some sort of guide track?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Production / Recording / Mixing / Mastering

Post by evenslow »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
evenslow wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:and I think it's been condenser mics from Riot Act onward. Which is a shame, because he's gotten so breathy and wharbly, and they're pushing his vox ahead of the rest of the mix, so the whole thing is super unflattering.
So why on earth would BOB go in that direction? He must think there's some kind of benefit. Or has he completely lost the plot?
Well, doesn't the wider audience love this kind of sound, though? Haven't the last three albums been PJ's most successful in a long time? It sounds like shit, but it's sellable shit.
Right, I'm guessing the method reflects whatever is popular commercially at this point in time.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
Post Reply