Page 1 of 2

Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 4:28 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 4:29 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 4:57 pm
by Simple Torture
tragabigzanda wrote: Can someone explain to me the effective difference between Iceland's President and PM? Wiki just says this:
Image

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 5:12 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 5:15 pm
by Jorge
I haven't been following this leak but I have heard Argentine president Mauricio Macri is somehow implicated in all of this

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 5:16 pm
by Chris_H_2
if this implicates sigur ros, i'm gonna be pissed

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 7:39 pm
by bodysnatcher
Anyone know what sort of involvement David Lee Roth has in this?

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 7:56 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 8:03 pm
by Kaius
Pathetic

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 8:49 pm
by bodysnatcher
i'm just glad it's not called PanamaGate

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue April 05, 2016 9:37 pm
by BurtReynolds
.

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Wed April 06, 2016 3:56 am
by Simple Torture
I've got bad news about Pedro Almodovar, trag: http://www.avclub.com/article/jackie-ch ... mpl-234856

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Wed April 06, 2016 4:10 am
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Wed April 06, 2016 4:12 am
by Simple Torture
You're in the pocket of Big Spanish Cinema, aren't you? I bet you have offshore accounts in the form of shell ice cream companies. Release your tax returns! Jet fuel can't melt steel beams!

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Wed April 06, 2016 4:28 am
by Sgt. Crackpot
Ha, my previous employer has been linked to this due to their military/government tie ins. This shit just got good.

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Thu April 07, 2016 3:28 am
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:Is there many americans implicated? Because Americans only care about America.

Why werent more Americans implicated? Does FATCA have enough reach to discourage Americans from even this level of elaborate offshoring?

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Thu April 07, 2016 3:31 am
by BurtReynolds
.

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Thu April 07, 2016 3:36 am
by LoathedVermin72
Rich people hide money to avoid taxes? I am shocked!

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Thu April 07, 2016 6:18 am
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is there many americans implicated? Because Americans only care about America.

Why werent more Americans implicated? Does FATCA have enough reach to discourage Americans from even this level of elaborate offshoring?
Apparently The United States already is a tax haven

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/panama ... rs-n551081
Well, as long as the IRS gets its cut, they dont seem to care. The funny thing is there isnt much reciprocity when it comes to foreign account information. Its not clear if the resulting competitive advantage for US banks is intended, but it seems to be the result.

Re: Panama Papers

Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 1:55 am
by Bi_3