Re: Who should PJ hire to replace EV?
Posted: Sun June 03, 2018 6:46 pm



"Ten"EJ wrote:One of these guys.
this is hyperbolic. parts of those records are interesting at times but neither is a cohesive statement. i wouldn't use those as my argument for pearl jam is bad.tragabigzanda wrote:but they also put out Up and Reveal towards the end. PJ has done nothing that good in many yearsstip wrote:REM called it quits after settling into a comforting familiarity and not feeling the fire. I wish they were still making music on occasion, or that I could see them live again
I wish PJ could make something nearly as good as Accelerate or Collapse Into Now.evenslow wrote:this is hyperbolic. parts of those records are interesting at times but neither is a cohesive statement. i wouldn't use those as my argument for pearl jam is bad.tragabigzanda wrote:but they also put out Up and Reveal towards the end. PJ has done nothing that good in many yearsstip wrote:REM called it quits after settling into a comforting familiarity and not feeling the fire. I wish they were still making music on occasion, or that I could see them live again
Haha I just made a similar comment about his live shows in the new albums threadverb_to_trust wrote:The John Prine record that just came out obliterates every Pearl Jam record from the last 20 years. And he's 80.
I am 33 years into my career.daft twat wrote:Why? They play some shows, trot out the hits, play more deep cuts than the average band, do a few too many covers, and seem to have a fun time in short spurts while middle aged white douches like me get together with old friends and have a good time. A new album just means 6 more songs per show that aren’t from their best years or, quite frankly, mine.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yup.tragabigzanda wrote:They shouldn't hire anyone else, that's silly. They should seriously just go on indefinite hiatus until some sort of fire returns.
Def Leppard, Journey, and Cheap Trick are coming through town together this summer. I cannot imagine people in the audience bitching that they don’t have the fire anymore. Christ, Pearl Jam is going on 30 years. No one in any occupation is killing it in year 27 of their job. Ed said it himself years ago - All that’s sacred comes from youth. He’s still the perfect captain for this old ship. And at least he stands at the front of the stage where people who paid to see him sing actually can.
lecherouslittlestump wrote: I am 33 years into my career.
I'm 34PHATJ wrote:lecherouslittlestump wrote: I am 33 years into my career.![]()
I’m 37... YEARS OLD
So you put all your value in money made. Seems like Pearl Jam is also still crushing it then.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I am 33 years into my career.daft twat wrote:Why? They play some shows, trot out the hits, play more deep cuts than the average band, do a few too many covers, and seem to have a fun time in short spurts while middle aged white douches like me get together with old friends and have a good time. A new album just means 6 more songs per show that aren’t from their best years or, quite frankly, mine.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yup.tragabigzanda wrote:They shouldn't hire anyone else, that's silly. They should seriously just go on indefinite hiatus until some sort of fire returns.
Def Leppard, Journey, and Cheap Trick are coming through town together this summer. I cannot imagine people in the audience bitching that they don’t have the fire anymore. Christ, Pearl Jam is going on 30 years. No one in any occupation is killing it in year 27 of their job. Ed said it himself years ago - All that’s sacred comes from youth. He’s still the perfect captain for this old ship. And at least he stands at the front of the stage where people who paid to see him sing actually can.
In my 25th year my average billings exceeded over half a billion
In my 28th year I brokered a deal worth $7.6 billion
In my 31st year I managed the merger of two trillion dollar companies
In Pearl Jam's 27th year they shat out Can't Deny Me
There is no excuse. Pearl Jam are the worst fucking piece of shit over the hill garbage band.
Up is one of REM's best, Reveal is very good too, both certainly better than Pearl Jam's last couple records.tragabigzanda wrote:i agree Reveal is disconnected, but Up is very much a cohesive album to my ears.evenslow wrote:this is hyperbolic. parts of those records are interesting at times but neither is a cohesive statement. i wouldn't use those as my argument for pearl jam is bad.tragabigzanda wrote:but they also put out Up and Reveal towards the end. PJ has done nothing that good in many yearsstip wrote:REM called it quits after settling into a comforting familiarity and not feeling the fire. I wish they were still making music on occasion, or that I could see them live again
The kindest, most lenient view of both of those records still puts them in the bottom quarter of REM's output.chewm wrote:Up is one of REM's best, Reveal is very good too, both certainly better than Pearl Jam's last couple records.tragabigzanda wrote:i agree Reveal is disconnected, but Up is very much a cohesive album to my ears.evenslow wrote:this is hyperbolic. parts of those records are interesting at times but neither is a cohesive statement. i wouldn't use those as my argument for pearl jam is bad.tragabigzanda wrote:but they also put out Up and Reveal towards the end. PJ has done nothing that good in many yearsstip wrote:REM called it quits after settling into a comforting familiarity and not feeling the fire. I wish they were still making music on occasion, or that I could see them live again