Page 2 of 2

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Tue July 08, 2014 8:26 pm
by epilogue
Taylor Swift > Shania Twain

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Tue July 08, 2014 9:00 pm
by Iholdthepain
Image

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Tue July 08, 2014 9:30 pm
by stip
theplatypus wrote:To be honest I didn't really think it through.
I liked it. Why are you listening to chud? That's like listening to me.

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Tue July 08, 2014 11:55 pm
by PryTo
Kaius wrote:She has some catchy songs, but you need to turn in your music critic card if you're going to go around propping up Taylor fucking swift.
It's 2014. I'm posting on a Pearl Jam-related message board. That alone mandates immediate revocation of any claims to credibility or taste in music.

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Wed July 09, 2014 12:01 am
by stip
What if you post ironically?

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Wed July 09, 2014 12:03 am
by Kaius
PryTo wrote:
Kaius wrote:She has some catchy songs, but you need to turn in your music critic card if you're going to go around propping up Taylor fucking swift.
It's 2014. I'm posting on a Pearl Jam-related message board. That alone mandates immediate revocation of any claims to credibility or taste in music.
It wasn't directed at you, but TOUCHÉ

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Wed July 09, 2014 12:03 am
by PryTo
I ran that by the musical credibility police. Doesn't count, either. Sorry.

Re: Taylor Swift's article in the WSJ

Posted: Wed July 09, 2014 12:05 am
by PryTo
Kaius wrote:
PryTo wrote:
Kaius wrote:She has some catchy songs, but you need to turn in your music critic card if you're going to go around propping up Taylor fucking swift.
It's 2014. I'm posting on a Pearl Jam-related message board. That alone mandates immediate revocation of any claims to credibility or taste in music.
It wasn't directed at you, but TOUCHÉ
It's the internet, K. No hurt feels whatsoever.