Red Mosquito

No way, Jorge. Crusade is very funny. Temple has very little going for it.

Crusade
Raiders
Crystal Skull
Temple

Bob Loblaw wrote:No way, Jorge. Crusade is very funny. Temple has very little going for it.

What? I simply listed the movies in the order they came out. Are you saying that's not the order they came out? Because I have hard data to back up my claims. Facts.

theplatypus wrote:I'm not sure it's the worst, but the most infuriating movie I've ever seen was Todd Solondz's "Palindromes". I had to take a walk to cool down after watching it, I was so mad.

Interesting.

numbers wrote:I stick by my story, Temple Of Doom sucks. It doesn't even compare to Raiders Of The Lost Ark or The Last Crusade.

This is as close as opinion can get to being fact.

durdencommatyler wrote:

numbers wrote:I stick by my story, Temple Of Doom sucks. It doesn't even compare to Raiders Of The Lost Ark or The Last Crusade.

This is as close as opinion can get to being fact.

like Godfather III, it weakens the other two by existing.

numbers wrote:like Godfather III, it weakens the other two by existing.

This goes for all movie series. ALL OF THEM! Which reduces Star Wars to a steaming pile.

The weird thing about Temple is that it's in between the two great ones, where almost all the rest it's the 3rd one.

Listen, let's not focus solely on bashing "Temple" and its place in the original trilogy, forgetting the real point of debate: the insane notion that it's somehow worse than the festering, putrefacient, stagnant cinematic estuary that is "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull".

What do people not like about Temple besides the girl? Personally, the only thing i hated was the raft out of the airplane bit, but there are a dozen similar moments in Crystal Skull. I like that its darker than Last Crusade, as well.

Temple is bad but Skull is much, much worse.

Last Crusade winks at the camera a little too much for my liking. The first two play it straighter.

Skull is better than Last Crusade..That one felt like a real tired cash grab to me.

dimejinky99 wrote:Skull is better than Last Crusade..That one felt like a real tired cash grab to me.

I'm starting to have a rational hatred of this thread.

BurtReynolds wrote:

Bob Loblaw wrote:

numbers wrote:I stick by my story, Temple Of Doom sucks. It doesn't even compare to Raiders Of The Lost Ark or The Last Crusade.

I never saw the fourth one, so I can't compare TOD to that one, but yeah, Temple sucks. Both Data and the blonde are annoying as all fuck.

Short Round is NOT annoying! He is awesome.

no, he is awesome when is name is Data and the movie is the Goonies

when his name is Short Round and he's in Temple of Doom, he's annoying

theplatypus wrote:Listen, let's not focus solely on bashing "Temple" and its place in the original trilogy, forgetting the real point of debate: the insane notion that it's somehow worse than the festering, putrefacient, stagnant cinematic estuary that is "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull".

South Park had it right on Crystal Skull..."look out Indy!"

The fact that Godfather I and II are diminished by the existence of III is pure idiocy.

I is excellent. II is perfection.

Worst movie I ever saw at the cinema was Hurly Burly. Nothing happens in that movie. Nothing.

I don't even know how someone could dig Indiana Jones and not love Temple.

Little Shop Of Horrors. I spent my allowance to see it, and was never the same afterwards.