Re: Bands Whose Last Album is Their Worst
Posted: Fri September 23, 2016 2:52 pm
I think it's supermega okayLoathedVermin72 wrote:I like Soundgarden as a band name.
Obviously. And that's exactly my point. If what you like about a band's name or your primary measuring stick for it's value is that its a great advertisement for their music, then you're limiting the band and your own potential enjoyment.tragabigzanda wrote:Come on Durden, that country song is anomaly to their catalog.durdencommatyler wrote:And that seems pretty limited. Does One sound like it should be performed by a band called Metallica? What about that country ballad they did?LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha well I guess if we're judging band names based on aesthetic accuracy then that makes sense.tragabigzanda wrote:I agree. But I think that were I raised in a cave, and had never heard of bands, that upon being explained of the concept and handed an early Metallica album, I'd expect the band to sound very much like what they actually sound like.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh man, Metallica is such a bad band name.
theplatypus wrote:I think it's supermega okayLoathedVermin72 wrote:I like Soundgarden as a band name.
"Eclectica"durdencommatyler wrote:Obviously. And that's exactly my point. If what you like about a band's name or your primary measuring stick for it's value is that its a great advertisement for their music, then you're limiting the band and your own potential enjoyment.tragabigzanda wrote:Come on Durden, that country song is anomaly to their catalog.durdencommatyler wrote:And that seems pretty limited. Does One sound like it should be performed by a band called Metallica? What about that country ballad they did?LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha well I guess if we're judging band names based on aesthetic accuracy then that makes sense.tragabigzanda wrote:I agree. But I think that were I raised in a cave, and had never heard of bands, that upon being explained of the concept and handed an early Metallica album, I'd expect the band to sound very much like what they actually sound like.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh man, Metallica is such a bad band name.
You can't bang your head or set yourself on fire to that though.Kevin Davis wrote:"Eclectica"durdencommatyler wrote:Obviously. And that's exactly my point. If what you like about a band's name or your primary measuring stick for it's value is that its a great advertisement for their music, then you're limiting the band and your own potential enjoyment.tragabigzanda wrote:Come on Durden, that country song is anomaly to their catalog.durdencommatyler wrote:And that seems pretty limited. Does One sound like it should be performed by a band called Metallica? What about that country ballad they did?LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha well I guess if we're judging band names based on aesthetic accuracy then that makes sense.tragabigzanda wrote:I agree. But I think that were I raised in a cave, and had never heard of bands, that upon being explained of the concept and handed an early Metallica album, I'd expect the band to sound very much like what they actually sound like.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh man, Metallica is such a bad band name.
I always liked the idea of having a band that changed its name with every album they released but kept the album title the same.Kevin Davis wrote:all bands should just be called "The (name of lead singer) Band"
Kevin Davis wrote:How do we know that that's not what all bands have been doing all along?
That's how I feel every time a new Soundgarden records comes out.Kevin Davis wrote:It's okay, I've lost interest