Red Mosquito

Peeps wrote:didnt ron say last night during the debate that the pro-choice laws enacted have nothing to do with the republican stance on being pro-life?

tragabigzanda wrote:Hot take: A few stalwart evangelical states will continue to block access for decades, while others will restructure abortion access from the bottom up, with broad voter support. So if you're a poor Black girl in Alabama, your limitations to body autonomy will be more a function of your socioeconomic standing than conservative Supreme Court rule, ergo equitable economic development continues to be the best path towards freedom and dignity for marginalized people.

The Supreme Court dismantled Roe. States are restoring it one by one.
Support for abortion cuts across party lines, performing significantly better at the ballot box than Biden and other Democrats.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/0 ... s-00126225

Break up with your major bank! Put your savings, checking, and CDs into impact-oriented banks that deploy their capital holdings into progressively minded private businesses!

tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley

McParadigm wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley

She currently has what is easily the most momentum of anybody polling at 16% or less in the Republican primary.

Bi_3 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley

She currently has what is easily the most momentum of anybody polling at 16% or less in the Republican primary.

Do you have thoughts on or have you seen polls that reflect a Trumpless ticket? He's not exactly selling out stadiums anymore. It could be that the red team is defaulting to him because they are lemmings and not because they would stay home if he wasnt on the ballot.

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley

She currently has what is easily the most momentum of anybody polling at 16% or less in the Republican primary.

Do you have thoughts on or have you seen polls that reflect a Trumpless ticket? He's not exactly selling out stadiums anymore. It could be that the red team is defaulting to him because they are lemmings and not because they would stay home if he wasnt on the ballot.

I think it’s impossible to predict how that scenario plays out in reality. So many factors would be involved in determining the outcome…chief among them: “why or how did Donald Trump leave the race?”

Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on

wease wrote:

Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on

You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.

Bammer wrote:

wease wrote:

Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on

You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.

This explains most of it. But how many pro-life women out there base their vote on this single issue? A lot.

wease wrote:

Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on

You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.

Bammer wrote:

wease wrote:

Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on

You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.

This explains most of it. But how many pro-life women out there base their vote on this single issue? A lot.