Re: 2013 song tournament: ilpazzo round 5
Posted: Fri August 02, 2013 12:25 pm
I think team speeno is winning me over 
stip wrote:lament picks Angel
Yep. Some of these matchups are gonna be brutal.EJ wrote:There's several strong teams here so far.
Me neither. I like the last little bit of vocals but overall its just 'nice'.Birds in Hell wrote:I must admit I really don't understand the appeal of Angel.
thats kinda how i feel alsoBirds in Hell wrote:I must admit I really don't understand the appeal of Angel.
Evocative. Beautiful. Emotional. Unburdened. Melodic. Full. Round. A beautiful story told convincingly. I love it. Really, what's not to love. But to each their own, I always say.Birds in Hell wrote:I must admit I really don't understand the appeal of Angel.
Indeed, you fervent practitioner of of Habitism.durdencommatyler wrote:Evocative. Beautiful. Emotional. Unburdened. Melodic. Full. Round. A beautiful story told convincingly. I love it. Really, what's not to love. But to each their own, I always say.Birds in Hell wrote:I must admit I really don't understand the appeal of Angel.
The band obviously agree with you. But what do they know. They released Habit.Birds in Hell wrote:Indeed, you fervent practitioner of of Habitism.durdencommatyler wrote:Evocative. Beautiful. Emotional. Unburdened. Melodic. Full. Round. A beautiful story told convincingly. I love it. Really, what's not to love. But to each their own, I always say.Birds in Hell wrote:I must admit I really don't understand the appeal of Angel.
I don't know, there's barely anything worthwhile going on in that song for me. I think it's one of the slightest, least memorable songs from their studio output.
I'll give you this: it should've been on Lost Dogs.durdencommatyler wrote:The band obviously agree with you. But what do they know. They released Habit.Birds in Hell wrote:Indeed, you fervent practitioner of of Habitism.durdencommatyler wrote:Evocative. Beautiful. Emotional. Unburdened. Melodic. Full. Round. A beautiful story told convincingly. I love it. Really, what's not to love. But to each their own, I always say.Birds in Hell wrote:I must admit I really don't understand the appeal of Angel.
I don't know, there's barely anything worthwhile going on in that song for me. I think it's one of the slightest, least memorable songs from their studio output.
Birds in Hell wrote:I'll give you this: it should've been on Lost Dogs.durdencommatyler wrote:The band obviously agree with you. But what do they know. They released Habit.Birds in Hell wrote:Indeed, you fervent practitioner of of Habitism.durdencommatyler wrote:Evocative. Beautiful. Emotional. Unburdened. Melodic. Full. Round. A beautiful story told convincingly. I love it. Really, what's not to love. But to each their own, I always say.Birds in Hell wrote:I must admit I really don't understand the appeal of Angel.
I don't know, there's barely anything worthwhile going on in that song for me. I think it's one of the slightest, least memorable songs from their studio output.
ilpazzo wrote:Got a car... Got some gas... Let's get out of here...Outta here fast...
UNTITLED
The more I agree with Orson, the more I question everything.Harry Lime wrote:It may have helped that I heard "Angel" for the first time when I was 12, but for me it's still great.
You guys just don't get it...